California Sports Betting Back For 2024
Share This TagsSports betting in California has been a topic of interest and debate over recent years and now we seem destined for another round for 2024 now that on October 27, two ballot initiatives were filed with the California attorney-general, proposing exclusive sports betting rights for tribes. The first initiative, titled “The Sports Wagering Regulation and Tribal Gaming Protection Act,” outlines the operational framework for sports betting under tribal jurisdiction. It suggests amending Article IV, section 19 of the California constitution to require tribes to contribute a percentage of their adjusted sports wagering gross gaming revenue (GGR) to the tribal sports wagering revenue sharing trust fund. Additionally, tribes would need to allocate a portion of their GGR to the California homelessness and mental health fund. The initiative also emphasizes that all sports betting advertising should target individuals aged 21 and over. It further mandates tribes to partner with licensed sports betting operators approved by the Tribal Gaming Agency and the California gaming agency.
The second ballot initiative, titled “The Tribal Gaming Protection Act,” focuses on granting tribes exclusive authority to offer sports betting in California. It aims to restrict sports betting operations solely to tribes, limiting the involvement of outside entities.
The filing of these ballot initiatives has sparked mixed reactions within the tribal gaming community. Victor Rocha, conference chair at the Indian Gaming Association, criticized Pala Interactive, the co-founder and CEO named in the ballot initiatives, for requesting tribal leaders to refrain from speaking to the press until they had a chance to talk to leadership. However, David Strow, vice-president of corporate communications for Boyd Gaming Group, clarified that Pala Interactive (now Boyd Interactive) was not involved in that request.
The California Nations Indian Gaming Association (CNIGA) expressed disappointment in not being consulted before the initiatives were filed. They stressed the importance of tribal governments making decisions that impact their future and called for open engagement with Indian Country.
The recent filing of these ballot initiatives comes as a surprise, considering that sports betting proposals were rejected by California voters in November 2022. Throughout 2022, sports betting gained momentum, with a February poll revealing some support for its legalization. In May 2022, a proposition to allow sports betting in California was included on the November ballot, alongside a tribal-backed initiative called the Tribal Sports Wagering Act Initiative. However, Democrats in California recommended voters reject sports betting proposals, including the tribal initiative.
Pala Interactive, the driving force behind the ballot initiatives, now has 180 days to gather the necessary signatures through a random sample method. To propose an amendment to the constitution, they need a minimum of 874,641 signatures. The deadline for filing the petition with county election officials is April 23, 2024. The random sample method requires election officials to verify at least 500 signatures in their office. If the total number of valid signatures falls within 95% to 110% of the required number, a full check method will be used.
While the future of sports betting in California remains uncertain, these ballot initiatives have breathed new life into the discussion. The potential for tribes to have exclusive rights to sports betting presents both opportunities and challenges. As the process unfolds, it is crucial for all stakeholders to engage in meaningful dialogue and consider the impact on tribal governments and the wider community.
Conclusion
The filing of the ballot initiatives for tribal-exclusive sports betting in California has reignited the debate surrounding the legalization of sports betting in the state. The proposed initiatives outline the regulatory framework and revenue sharing mechanisms that would govern sports betting operations under tribal jurisdiction. The reaction from tribal leaders and gaming associations has been mixed, with calls for greater consultation and dialogue. The path forward involves gathering signatures through a random sample method and navigating the complex process of amending the state constitution. As the momentum for sports betting continues to grow, it is essential to consider the interests of all stakeholders and ensure that decisions align with the needs and aspirations of tribal governments and the broader community.